We’re Humans. Not Programmed Republican Robots.

I’m fascinated with scientific and technological advancements. You don’t have to go far past Adam Fogle’s blog to know that I’m a big Star Trek fan. To that end, I think it would be great to build a colony on Mars as a back-up plan for when we ruin this planet.

But have we reached that level of advancement? Is it even possible? How much would it cost the American taxpayers? And what other programs would suffer from dedicating a stream of money to such a large endeavor?

I have to admit, if the building of a Mars colony was inserted into the Republican platform, I probably would disagree with it for now because too many questions remain to be answered. If I were running for office and some activist demanded that I sign the party platform, I wouldn’t do it, and thus I would most likely be labeled a RINO.

I think the concept of private school choice is a fantastic idea. Aside from the fact that most private school parents, or at least 98% of the ones I’ve ever met, send their kids to private school to get them away from the public school kids like me, competition, in theory, will improve the entire education system. It’s worked just about everywhere else, but it’s still just a theory in this case. South Carolina is a complicated state plagued by a racist past. That past has created segments in our culture where pockets of poor, often minority districts dominate. I don’t see how the economy of South Carolina’s Hampton County, where I spent most of my summers as a child, can handle any sort of educational competition. And let’s all be honest, it’s those areas that are killing South Carolina’s test scores.

I support the idea of private school choice, but like my support of a Mars colony, I have a lot of questions regarding its economic feasibility like – how can we be sure we’re not stripping funding from the fantastic schools in Spartanburg County? As a strong fiscal conservative, I demand answers to those questions before we change the entire structure of our education tax code and dump millions upon millions of dollars into private schools. I’ve heard the rhetoric, yet I’ve seen no convincing poof.

I will not, at this stage in the game, sign a document pledging my support for private school choice legislation. Maybe in the future. Maybe even tonight if someone can show me some good numbers. But not right now at this minute as I write this blog post. (For the record, I think South Carolina should enact a private school choice pilot program.)

That’s what scares me about this dangerous effort afoot to cleanse our party of anyone who disagrees with any part of our platform. There are many activists across the nation who are even demanding that candidates and legislators sign the party platform or else. Or else they’ll be labeled a RINO.

Folks, we really have to get away from this idea that if you’re not with me 100%, then you’re against me.

We are a party that prides ourselves on the examples set by President Ronald Reagan. If I were to say that I disagree with President Reagan, I’d surely be labeled a RINO. Luckily, I almost entirely agree with President Reagan, especially when he said, “The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor.”

Looking at the South Carolina Republican Party platform, I’m as far right as one can be, except for that one issue, which I support in theory. That doesn’t mean I’m a 1% traitor. That means I’m a 99% friend.

I’m 100% pro-life. I don’t like the idea of any exceptions. But what about the woman who is raped or the husband who is looking at raising his wife’s rapist’s child? Can’t we at least understand where they’re coming from? We don’t have to agree and we can push them toward the adoption alternative, but can’t we at least understand and grant them some compassion instead of labeling them pro-choice? Can’t we withhold the RINO label if they refuse to sign the Republican platform?

I support the NRA and I’m proud to have just bought my first gun. But what about the hard core Republican leader who was held up last night with a semi-automatic Uzi? He’s distraught. He saw his life flash before his young eyes. He agrees with 99% of the Republican Party platform but now he wants to tighten gun laws. He’s as pro-life and anti-tax as anyone we’ve ever met, but is he all of a sudden a Democrat because he disagrees with one leg of our platform?

According to Ronald Reagan, these people are allies. They’re friends. They’re Republicans.

If President Reagan is to remain our party’s hero, wouldn’t those that disagree with him actually be the RINOs? I think so.

I lived most of my childhood in the worst, most economically depressed parts of North Charleston, South Carolina. If groups like the South Carolina Policy Council, who often label legislators as RINOs, are against bringing Boeing to North Charleston, I want to be whatever they’re not. But that’s not a RINO. That’s a reasonable human being. It just goes to show how loosely the term is being thrown around.

There is a time and a place for the RINO label. Senator Arlen Specter was a pretty good example. So is Dede Scozzafava. We should not put up with big government tax and spend liberals who call themselves Republican. That’s obvious. What I’m saying is that we should not use the RINO label so loosely and we especially should not call someone a RINO just because they refuse to sign the large party platform because of one or two issues.

We didn’t win Virginia and New Jersey by telling folks that they’re RINOs. We won by convincing them that they’re more Republican than Democrat.

Let’s save the RINO label for those who really deserve it and cut everyone else a little slack. Let’s pick our fights and take out real RINOs instead of splitting our party in half just because someone doesn’t agree with us on every single issue. We’re humans with different experiences and reasons for believing what we believe. We aren’t programmed Republican robots. That’s something President Ronald Reagan obviously understood.

Popularity: 1% [?]



Comments

  1. Nathan November 9th

    Comment Arrow

    Great post. I have no problem with roasting Scozzafava and Specter — they are by very definition “RINOs” — but I think we should be careful about throwing that term around on the “one percenters”. (e.g. Rep. Cao. While I strongly disagree with his health care vote, he is in one of the bluest districts in the country currently occupied by a Republican. And I think he would have sided with the GOP if his vote was needed. I’m willing to cut him a little slack.) By the way, on the school choice issue, I think it should be left up to local districts and states. Federalism, baby! That should be the heart of the Republican platform anyway!


  2. Fact Check November 9th

    Comment Arrow

    Ronald Reagan (which you seem to think is an argument without premise) called for a national tuition tax credit in 1982.
    School Choice offers credits of about 1/3 of what the public schools are now spending, so you do not need to worry about the schools in Spartanburg, which you think are good, losing revenues.
    There is no mechanical difference between your new Glock and a semi-automatic Uzi – they shoot the same bullet at the same rate.
    Hampton County already has two private schools, serving over 300 children in grades K-12.
    Maybe you need to do more research and less speculative editorializing…


  3. Wesley November 9th

    Comment Arrow

    Fact Check -

    Thanks. Keep throwing those numbers out. That’s the kind of information I’m looking for. As for doing more research…I don’t think I should have to. When someone is trying to push a major legislative agenda, they should be freely giving out great research to convince voters and legislators, but instead they’ve been arguing “you’re a RINO.” It’s not my job to do the research. It’s their job to convince me with something other than offensive rhetoric.

    I’m not arguing anything about the Glock or the Uzi. It was simply an example.

    I know that Hampton County has private schools. My point is that the tax base there isn’t good enough to fund competition. I don’t think private school choice will solve the problem until new industry locates there and creates new jobs to fund a strong tax base. I also don’t think good industry will locate there until the education system is fixed. It’s a nasty vicious circle.


  4. Earl Capps November 10th

    Comment Arrow

    From one Republican who has been labeled a RINO to another: Excellent posting.


  5. Fact Check November 18th

    Comment Arrow

    The public schools in Hampton County spent $43.1 million dollars in 2008.

    The two districts only serve 3,654 students. That’s $11,795.29 per child, or just $460 less than the South Carolina state average.

    You concern about “the tax base” and its impact on public education in the county is speculative and unfounded.

    Still, if private schools in Hampton are charging tuition of 1/2 to 1/4th public school spending and migration of children out of public schools increases public school per-pupil revenues (since the money is allocated programatically), this would be an argument for private school choice, not against it.


Add Yours

  • Author Avatar

    YOU


Comment Arrow



About Author

Wesley

Wesley Donehue is a Republican political consultant, tech enthusiast, and coffee addict. Called "the political high tech 'Wizard of Oz'" by WSPA's Amy Wood, Wesley blogs about the intersection of politics, technology, and business.